Optimal Finger Selection for Perfusion Index Measurement in Patients with Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Main Article Content

Derallah A Lindra
Savira
Diniwati Mukhtar
Helwiyah Umniyati
Endang Purwaningsih
Ahmad Rusdan H Utomo
Faisal Yunus

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may effect chronic hypoxemia due to ventilation–perfusion mismatch. The perfusion index (PI) based on pulse oximetry reflects peripheral perfusion and may vary by measurement site. This study evaluated differences in PI values among fingers to determine the most reliable site for PI measurement in patients with COPD.


Materials and Methods: This descriptive observational research with a cross-sectional design among patients with stable COPD attending the Pulmonology Clinic at Kolonel Abundjani General Hospital in August 2025. Subjects were recruited using consecutive sampling. Patient characteristics, including sex, age, smoking history, and Brinkman index, were obtained from medical records. Perfusion index measurements were taken from all fingers of both hands using a pulse oximeter and analyzed using descriptive statistics.


Results: A total of 22 patients with stable COPD were ivolvedncluded. Most participants were male (86.4%) and aged over 55 years (86.4%), with the majority having a history of smoking and a Brinkman index of 200–600 (45.5%). The highest mean PI value in the right hand was observed in the ring finger (4.89 ± 3.12), while in the left hand it was found in the index finger (5.59 ± 3.41). PI values tended to be higher in several fingers of the left hand. The coefficient of variation analysis showed considerable variability across all fingers, although the thumbs exhibited relatively lower variability. A significant difference was observed only in the middle finger between the right and left hands (p = 0.012). Age and smoking history were not significantly associated with PI values (p > 0.05).


Conclusion: PI measurements in patients with stable COPD varied across different fingers. The thumbs showed relatively more stable values and may represent more reliable sites for PI assessment.

Article Details

How to Cite
A Lindra , D., Savira, Mukhtar, D. ., Umniyati, H., Purwaningsih, E. ., H Utomo, A. R. ., & Yunus, F. . (2026). Optimal Finger Selection for Perfusion Index Measurement in Patients with Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Bio Medical Science, 6(05), 983–988. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijpbms/v6-i5-01
Section
Articles

References

I. Singh D, Agusti A, Anzueto A, Barnes PJ, Bourbeau J, Celli BR, et al. Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease: the GOLD science committee report 2019. European Respiratory Journal. 2019, 53(5): 1900164.

II. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Hasil Utama Riskesdas 2018. Jakarta: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan. 2018.

III. Amalakanti S, and Mohan RP. Pulse oximetry overestimates oxygen saturation in COPD. Respiratory care. 2016, 61(4): 423-27.

IV. Batista KS, Cézar ID, Benedetto IG, Silva RMC, Wagner LE, Silva DP, et al. Continuous monitoring of pulse oximetry during the 6-minute walk test improves clinical outcomes prediction in COPD. Respiratory Care. 2023, 68(1): 92-100.

V. Dogru S, Parent AA, Coppel J, Karaman T, Aydinli B, and Demir ZA. Perfusion Index: Identifying the Optimal Finger for Accurate Measurement. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2024, 10(1):1-5.

VI. Sun X, He H, Xu M, and Long Y. Peripheral perfusion index of pulse oximetry in adult patients: a narrative review. Eur J Med Res. 2024, 29(1):457.

VII. Swain SM, Lata M, Kumar S, Mondal S, Behera JK, and Mondal H. A Cross-Sectional Study on the Agreement of Perfusion Indexes Measured on Different Fingers by a Portable Pulse Oximeter in Healthy Adults. Cureus. 2022, 14(5):e24853.

VIII. Yunus F, Ariawan WP, and Nurwidya F. Smoking Behaviors and Related Factor in Indonesian Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in National Reference Hospital for Respiratory Diseases. PJCM. 2019, 25(1):6-10.

IX. Kojima S, Sakakibara H, Motani S, Hirose K, Mizuno F, Ochiai M, et al. Incidence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and the Relationship between Age and Smoking in a Japanese Population. J Epidemiol. 2007, 17(2):54–60.

X. Mulyawan E, and Setiawan JA. The correlation between smoking cumulative dose based on Brinkman Index with peak expiratory flow rate. J Gen Fam Med. 2024, 25(4):193-197.

XI. Sari DM, Besral B, Djuwita R, Damayanti T, and Murtiani F. Prevalence and Predictors of COPD in Indonesian Smokers Attending Posbindu Community Health Centers: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Media Publikasi Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia. 2026, 9(2):1-12

XII. Lima A, and Bakker J. Noninvasive monitoring of peripheral perfusion. Intensive Care Med. 2005, 31(1):1316–1326

XIII. Aboy M, McNames J, Thong T, Tsunami D, Ellenby MS, and Goldstein B. An automatic beat detection algorithm for pressure signals. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 2005, 52(10):1662-70.

XIV. Shelley KH. Photoplethysmography: beyond the calculation of arterial oxygen saturation and heart rate. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2007;105(6 Suppl):S31-S36.

XV. Hales JRS, Stephens FRN, Fawcett AA, Daniel K, Sheahan J, Westerman RA, et al. Observations on a new non‐invasive monitor of skin blood flow. Clinical and experimental pharmacology and physiology. 1989, 16(5): 403-415.

XVI. Middlekauff HR, Park J, and Moheimani RS. Adverse effects of cigarette and noncigarette smoke exposure on the autonomic nervous system: mechanisms and implications for cardiovascular risk. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2014, 64(16): 1740-50.